W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-ruby] The default value of ruby-align is undesirable for bopomofo

From: Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:48:03 +0800
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E277C97B-93E9-43D6-8EE4-72377DED5C52@wanderer.tw>
To: "Asmus Freytag (t)" <asmus-inc@ix.netcom.com>
Thank you, Asmus. That's what I mean.

WANDERER Bobby Tung
Sent from my iPhone.

> Asmus Freytag (t) <asmus-inc@ix.netcom.com> 於 2015年2月11日 下午12:33 寫道:
> 
>> On 2/10/2015 7:21 PM, fantasai wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2015 08:15 PM, Bobby Tung wrote:       
>>> . In my opinion, when justified, the space should be inserted into 
>>> every letter spaces in the line. The principle is more important than justification opportunities. 
>> 
>> Justification opportunity means "place where you insert space when justifying". 
>> So your sentence makes no sense to me... 
>> 
>> ~fantasai
> I understood this to mean that when you justify in Chinese, you really space all characters evenly -- without exception -- as odd as it may look to those used to other languages. In other words, in a typical Chinese line of text justification opportunities exist between each pair of characters, and they all have the same level of priority.
> 
> A./

Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 04:48:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC