- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:30:28 +1100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr.:
> > h1 {
> > font: 48px FancyFont;
> > font-palette: dark-background; /* select the first palette in the
> > font flagged as appropriate for use on dark backgrounds */
> > }
>
> So these are predefined palette names that indirect to one of the
> built-in palettes? Sounds good to me.
Yes.
> So, in summary, I like:
>
> @font-features {
> @palettes {
> /* map of author-chosen names to font-chosen palette indexes */
> }
> @palette-entries {
> /* map of author-chosen palette entry names
> to font-chosen palette entry indexes */
> }
> }
>
> font-palette: light | dark | <palette-name> | [ <palette-index-name> <color> ]#
I think the names “light” and “dark” might be confusing. It’s not clear
whether “light” means you are selecting a palette that has light colours
(and thus looks good on a dark background) or selecting a palette that
looks good on a light background.
--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 00:30:55 UTC