W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-ruby] Interaction of autohiding and some properties

From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 21:56:10 +1100
Message-ID: <CAMdq69-4bH2ce5HriKhTyJpXR-Z2F71a2ubTe6nL-T8=7emz_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>, "Koji a Ishii | Koji | EBJB" <koji.a.ishii@mail.rakuten.com>
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:18 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
wrote:

> On 09/05/2014 05:40 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I notice that it is not defined what should happen if "ruby-merge:
>> collapse" and/or "ruby-align: *" are applied to a container
>> which contains an autohidden annotation. For example:
>>
>> <ruby style="ruby-merge:collapse">
>>      <rb>振</rb><rb>り</rb><rb>仮</rb><rb>名</rb>
>>      <rt>ふ</rt><rt>り</rt><rt>が</rt><rt>な</rt>
>> </ruby>
>>
>> I propose that it should be rendered as two separate segments, like:
>>
>> <ruby>
>>      <rb>振</rb><rt>ふ</rt>
>> <ruby>
>> り
>> <ruby style="ruby-merge:collapse">
>>      <rb>仮</rb><rb>名</rb>
>>      <rt>が</rt><rt>な</rt>
>> </ruby>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> I think either this or not auto-hiding the text. I'm not sure what is best.
>
> Koji, Murakami, what do you think? If the ruby annotation is centered
> across
> the text, is it better to split the annotation or to show the auto-hidden
> text?


I discussed this with Koji privately after this mail being ignored for a
long time, and he said the annotation should not be hidden in this case,
unless the whole annotation is identical to the whole base. This would also
be easier to implement than the style I proposed. (Though I'd prefer it
never be hidden even if the whole thing are identical, because that would
be easier to impl, and I don't think it make much sense to do so.)

- Xidorn
Received on Saturday, 7 February 2015 10:57:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC