W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: Bopomofo summary updated

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:10:19 -0500
Message-ID: <54D5902B.7020102@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On 02/05/2015 05:30 AM, Richard Ishida wrote:
> hi Ted,
> On 04/02/2015 18:21, Edward O'Connor wrote:
>> Also, tone mark positioning
>> isn't like other optional font features like ligatures. Their position
>> isn't stylistic.
> The jury seems to be still out on whether it's desirable to add tones as a spacing character after letters in some cases,
> rather than combining like a diacritic, so i'm inclined to think that there may be some stylistic possibility.

Note we can handle that the same way as other stylistic preferences in the font.

Received on Saturday, 7 February 2015 05:18:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:51 UTC