- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 05:23:56 +0000
- To: Peter Moulder <pjrm@mail.internode.on.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 2/6/15, 4:12 PM, "Peter Moulder" <pjrm@mail.internode.on.net> wrote: >On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 04:38:44AM +0000, Alan Stearns wrote: > >> Until then, I think a less-nuanced text-wrap:balance is still useful. > >More useful still would be a feature differing only in that it didn't >make as >much of a change to the apparent measure, merely using this freedom to >avoid >very short last line rather than insisting on having all lines equal. >Yes? No, I don’t agree. I think in current browsers the less-nuanced text-wrap:balance is more useful than a feature that tries to fix short last line lengths. Short last line lengths is a more difficult problem that will take more work to solve. > >That would seem a closer way of matching the use cases that have been >mentioned, and the implementation is very similar -- if anything, easier >because of having more flexibility with how much goes to the last line. I still think there’s a clear distinction between these cases: 1. Balance lines, allowing changes to the ‘normal’ line measure (headlines, short caption/aside) 2. Try to fix a short last line without changing the ‘normal’ line measure too much (anything more like a paragraph) I think most of the use cases brought up for text-wrap:balance fit into the first category. I could certainly be wrong. What do others think? Thanks, Alan
Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 05:24:30 UTC