- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:37:22 +1100
- To: Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi> wrote: > On 02/05/2015 01:20 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> You don't need strong isolation primitives to do a lot of good. >> Simple composition helpers lift an *enormous* weight off the shoulders >> of web devs, and make whole classes of bugs obsolete. Shadow DOM is >> precisely that composition helper right now. In most contexts, you >> can't ever touch something inside of shadow DOM unless you're doing it >> on purpose, so there's no way to "friendly fire" (as Brian puts it). > > If we want to just help with composition, then we can find simpler > model than shadow DOM with its multiple shadow root per host and event > handling > oddities and what not. (and all the mess with is-in-doc is still something > to be sorted out etc.) Try to. ^_^ >> Stronger isolation does solve some problems, sure. But trying to >> imply that those are the only problems we need to solve, > > No one has tried to imply that. I don't know where you got that. By your statements implying that composition issues can just be handled by better discipline and some selector modification, in the message I responded to earlier. I'm not sure how to interpret those statement if you didn't mean that composition wasn't worth solving. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 00:38:11 UTC