- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:00:56 +1100
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: Arron Eicholz <arronei@microsoft.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: >> On 04 Feb 2015, at 20:50, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't think this is or should be our goal at all. The number of >> Level 1 specs suggests that CSS is far wider than the CSS2 base we're >> still building off of. > > Calling it CSS 3 sounds wrong, but if we start including links to the (sufficiently mature) level 1 modules, it's a good document tying together all the mature parts of CSS, and giving an intro to the whole. > > At the same time, I am not what the difference is between that and the snapshot (assuming we maintain it). Yeah, you've just described the snapshot. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 23:01:43 UTC