W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [CSS21] Ambiguity in tokenizer, "normative appendix G"

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:00:56 +1100
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBicXgTDZ9VKaXH0i=SQHsKmNE7H5FJTKU1Sf_zO2p6tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: Arron Eicholz <arronei@microsoft.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
>> On 04 Feb 2015, at 20:50, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think this is or should be our goal at all.  The number of
>> Level 1 specs suggests that CSS is far wider than the CSS2 base we're
>> still building off of.
> Calling it CSS 3 sounds wrong, but if we start including links to the (sufficiently mature) level 1 modules, it's a good document tying together all the mature parts of CSS, and giving an intro to the whole.
> At the same time, I am not what the difference is between that and the snapshot (assuming we maintain it).

Yeah, you've just described the snapshot.

Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 23:01:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:51 UTC