- From: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 05:00:25 +0000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 05:00:52 UTC
On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 3:55:17 PM Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 12:54:41 AM Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com> > wrote: > >> In [1] you have: > >> > >> "When comparing two declarations, if one of them is in a shadow tree > >> and the other is in a document that contains that shadow tree, then > >> for normal rules the declaration from the outer document wins, and for > >> important rules the declaration from the shadow tree wins." > >> > >> What about nested shadow trees? Could "document" be "shadow tree" as > well? > > > > I think so. You can replace "document", "shadow tree", with "parent node > > tree", "child node tree" respectively. > > I'll change the spec to use those terms. Can you give me a link to > where they're defined? > Yeah, these are now defined in the Shadow DOM spec. http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/#dfn-parent-tree http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/#dfn-child-tree > ~TJ >
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 05:00:52 UTC