W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-scoping] Shadow Cascading

From: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 05:00:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFpjS_3X+OPHsdj6h2aD3ccNUHobSJtPDj0ibEro8Y8Pm_OjTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 3:55:17 PM Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote:
> > On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 12:54:41 AM Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
> wrote:
> >> In [1] you have:
> >>
> >> "When comparing two declarations, if one of them is in a shadow tree
> >> and the other is in a document that contains that shadow tree, then
> >> for normal rules the declaration from the outer document wins, and for
> >> important rules the declaration from the shadow tree wins."
> >>
> >> What about nested shadow trees? Could "document" be "shadow tree" as
> well?
> >
> > I think so. You can replace "document", "shadow tree", with "parent node
> > tree", "child node tree" respectively.
>
> I'll change the spec to use those terms.  Can you give me a link to
> where they're defined?
>

Yeah, these are now defined in the Shadow DOM spec.
http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/#dfn-parent-tree
http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/#dfn-child-tree



> ~TJ
>
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 05:00:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:01 UTC