W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [css-scoping] Shadow Cascading

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 20:54:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDjNQaw0Bywur6fD4fDoUJBxyK4nJHL2mMR=TVQdttW1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>
Cc: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 12:54:41 AM Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com> wrote:
>> In [1] you have:
>> "When comparing two declarations, if one of them is in a shadow tree
>> and the other is in a document that contains that shadow tree, then
>> for normal rules the declaration from the outer document wins, and for
>> important rules the declaration from the shadow tree wins."
>> What about nested shadow trees? Could "document" be "shadow tree" as well?
> I think so. You can replace "document", "shadow tree", with "parent node
> tree", "child node tree" respectively.

I'll change the spec to use those terms.  Can you give me a link to
where they're defined?

Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 04:55:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:51 UTC