- From: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:06:12 +0000
- To: Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>
- CC: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On 3/2/15 16:38, Bobby Tung wrote: > Hi JK > > I don't what you do not agree with. > > In Print and plain text conversion, light tone usually placed before bopomofo character like: ˙ㄧㄚ just like what your example shown. > > 1. <ruby>呀<rt>ㄧㄚ˙</rt></ruby> > > 2. <ruby>呀<rt>˙ㄧㄚ</rt></ruby> > > I think authors should mark bopomofo and light tone as 2. And browser do nothing to reorder. > OK, I think I must have misunderstood what you were saying in an earlier message -- sorry for my confusion. Your example (2) agrees with what I was thinking. (After re-reading some of the earlier messages in this thread, I'm finding myself less certain just how well-established this convention is. In particular, Richard's page mentions that input methods expect the light tone to be typed after the syllable, which was not what I thought I remembered -- but I'm not a Chinese typist!) Anyway, sorry for the noise due to my mis-reading. JK
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 17:06:40 UTC