- From: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 23:29:21 +0000
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/27/2014 07:31 PM, fantasai wrote: > We have a couple of key issues open that we would particularly like > feedback on: > > A. Naming of the box-hiding-and-showing property. Please send us > suggestions for improvement! (Or comments on what you like about > the current name. We're pretty unsure atm, but want it to be > easily understandable.) > http://www.w3.org/TR/css-display-3/#box-suppress 'box-suppress: hide' has multiple issues noted in the spec[1] so I wonder if it would be better to move it to the next level of the spec? 'box-suppress: show | discard' OTOH is straightforward to implement and is something that authors have been asking for for a long time. My 2 cents on the naming: 'box-suppress: discard' sounds like a double negation and I find it hard to understand what it does from just reading the words. I would prefer a positive term instead, like 'box-construction: normal | none' or 'box-features: all | none'. ('none' is to associate it with 'display: none' to make it easy to remember what it does). /Mats [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-display-3/#box-suppress
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2015 23:29:53 UTC