- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:29:58 +0900
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2015 05:30:49 UTC
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:15 AM, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > On 08/25/2015 02:59 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > >> I propose that we should add "text-orientation: upright" to the > >> "rt:lang(zh-TW)" rule. > >> > >> The reason is that, all the tone marks in bopomofo (U+02CA, U+02C7, > >> U+02CB, U+02D9) have Vertical_Orientation property "R" while the > >> bopomofo characters are all "U". It means, without explicitly setting > >> text-orientation to upright, the text run would break between them, > >> which makes it impossible to use font feature to place the tone mark > >> properly. > > > > I think it would make more sense to have Unicode update UTR50 to make > > these characters upright in mixed-orientation text (or otherwise tailor > > it within CSS as a whole). It's not just a problem with ruby. > > Well, that could be tricky, because those characters might also be > used with latin scripts. I'm not sure anyway. > > Koji, any thoughts? > Unified code points tend to be controversial, and I'm not sure how much common these code points are in Latin usages. I can ask at Unicode ML. /koji
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2015 05:30:49 UTC