On Wednesday 2013-02-20 20:46 -0800, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> But wording there is wrong:
>
> "This provides a way for authors to specify different values of the
> ‘transition-*’ properties
> for the “forward” and “reverse” transitions"
>
> If you have for example these three rules:
>
> input { transition: color linear 1s; }
> input:checked { transition: color ease 2s; }
> input:active { transition: color linear 3s; }
>
> then there is no way for you to specify separate reverse transitions:
> :checked -> :not(:checked) *and*
> :active -> :not(:active)
In https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/d6054651da91 I clarified that the
example only makes sense when the transitions are between two states.
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)