On Monday 2013-02-04 15:19 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Note that, while this *is* specified in Transitions, it's missing the
> "inset" clause. As written, transitions will fail when going from an
> inset shadow to "none".
I've fixed this by specifying that "none" is treated as a
zero-length list, which means it then falls back to correctly
handling inset.
https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/bec42e8ed638
> I think, as a general rule, that if we can define a reasonable "null"
> value for an entry in the list, we should allow animation between
> lists of differing lengths. We can do so for shadows and anything
> with images.
I agree with the general rule. In the case of images, I think this
is better dealt with in images 4 than in transitions, though, since
the long term plan is to migrate interpolation rules to the places
where the value types are defined.
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)