- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:43:15 -0700
- To: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, mats@mozilla.com
On 04/24/2015 03:50 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: >> Regarding your question about the undefined named lines, you can check >> the a previous thread [4] in which we discussed about the expected behavior. Thank you - Tab's reply there... https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0250.html ...confirms my suspicion about the intended behavior here. (Specifically, he says: 'The *next* line [after the final explicit-grid-line] will be part of the implicit grid, and will be treated as having the name "foo"'.) So, the spec just needs to be clarified, to prevent others from being misled/confused on this, like I was. :) As noted in my previous post, it needs to unambiguously define (and consistently use) the term "the implicit grid", OR it needs to unambiguously define some other term like "implicit grid line" & use that instead of the vaguely-universal term "all lines in the implicit grid". ~Daniel
Received on Friday, 24 April 2015 23:43:46 UTC