- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:42:00 -0700
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > The downside is that E is not what either of the existing implementations > I am aware of do. I don't have easy access to the corpus of existing > content to assess if we'd have a compat problem to do that. These properties > are heavily used on TV sites, so there is legacy content to consider. Hm, true. We'd have to check. > Less interesting, but still worth thinking about is the question of spec advancement. > To get to level 3 past CR quickly, it may make things easier to do the > more lenient option C in level 3, and only tighten it up in level 4. That's backwards from how we generally do that. Outlawing more things in the future is generally page-hostile. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 16:42:47 UTC