- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:15:21 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
This change seems fine to me. IIRC, think the point of the existing behavior was to make multi-line-with-just-one-line flex containers behave the same as truly-single-line flex containers, for consistency's sake. For example, in a flex container that just has one flex item, it would seem silly for "flex-wrap:wrap" to change the layout, since clearly no wrapping can happen when there's just one item. However, I think you're right that it's probably more important to make wrappable flex containers consistent on their layout/sizing behavior, regardless of whether they end up needing to wrap or not, to avoid a weird & surprising discontinuity when the last wrapped item stops needing to be wrapped, in scenarios like the wide-monitor one you brought up. ~Daniel
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 06:15:49 UTC