- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:53:09 -0700
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > This change seems fine to me. > > IIRC, think the point of the existing behavior was to make > multi-line-with-just-one-line flex containers behave the same as > truly-single-line flex containers, for consistency's sake. For example, > in a flex container that just has one flex item, it would seem silly for > "flex-wrap:wrap" to change the layout, since clearly no wrapping can > happen when there's just one item. Yes, this behavior was an intentional change, requested by Alex Mog back when he was an editor. I thought it was weird, but whatever. > However, I think you're right that it's probably more important to make > wrappable flex containers consistent on their layout/sizing behavior, > regardless of whether they end up needing to wrap or not, to avoid a > weird & surprising discontinuity when the last wrapped item stops > needing to be wrapped, in scenarios like the wide-monitor one you > brought up. Yeah. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:53:57 UTC