- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:11:37 +0100
- To: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
[resending with style list in cc, and updated subject please reply to this email only] I looked through the remaining open issues at http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/2 and here are my conclusions: ISSUE-316 Line breaking defaults I'd still like a spec change. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0165.html ISSUE-331: No kashida style or relationship to styles 'distribute' and 'inter-word' I think this can now be closed. I think that http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/#justify-cursive says enough for now, ie. don't do stupid things, and go ahead in the browser if you think you know how to do it. ISSUE-333: 'letter-spacing' and Arabic I suggest i18n closes this now. The outstanding suggestion is only a suggestion. ISSUE-334: 'letter-spacing' and Indic The definitions of typographic character unit and grapheme cluster, plus the following examples make the point that the appropriate boundaries are script or language dependent. I'm inclined to think that is may be worth reminding the implementer of this, however, by appending something like the following sentence to the end of the first para in section 8.2. "Letter-spacing should only be applied to scripts where the rules for determining typographic character units are understood and implementable." ISSUE-354: Questions about letter-spacing for Arabic script Some of the clarifications at the top could be added to the spec text. ri
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 17:12:12 UTC