- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:10:56 -0500
- To: Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 11/05/2014 04:47 PM, Javier Fernandez wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on the implementation of the align-content and > justify-content properties for grid and it seems ISSUE6 is still > pending; I've already made some assumptions for the ongoing > implementation but it'd be great to solve it as soon as possible. > > - http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-align-3/#issue-dda0e769 Issue 6 is just a terminology issue wrt "bounds of the grid". Probably not the issue you're concerned about. > I'm assuming 2 different interpretations depending on the kind if value > used for the alignment. > > - in case of <content-position> values, the 'alignment.container' is > the grid container and the 'alignment subject' is the box defined by the > grid tracks > - in case of <content-distribution>,the 'alignment container' is the > grid track, while the grid items placed on it are the 'alignment subject' . > > I'm not sure how to deal with items placed on the same Gird Cell or > occupying more than one row/column track when using content-distribution > values. Actually, I don't think what you wrote (point #2) makes sense... We hadn't strongly considered the interpretation of the <content-distribution> values for Grid; I think the original thought was to keep the entire grid as a single unit, so they'd all fall back to their fallback alignment. However, we did get some feedback on people wanting to stretch out the grid by spacing apart the tracks: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0108.html So, ideally, we would do that for the <content-distribution> values. (It would have some interesting interactions with the sizing of spanning grid items, though, and we haven't quite worked out the implications.) > It's also not clear to me which are the cases where content-distribution > values should fall-back to the corresponding content-position value. Currently, I'd go with "always", unless we figure out justification of grid tracks. > Shouldn't these particular cases be described in the Grid spec ? Yes. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 13:11:32 UTC