- From: Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 22:47:08 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi, I'm working on the implementation of the align-content and justify-content properties for grid and it seems ISSUE6 is still pending; I've already made some assumptions for the ongoing implementation but it'd be great to solve it as soon as possible. - http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-align-3/#issue-dda0e769 I'm assuming 2 different interpretations depending on the kind if value used for the alignment. - in case of <content-position> values, the 'alignment.container' is the grid container and the 'alignment subject' is the box defined by the grid tracks - in case of <content-distribution>,the 'alignment container' is the grid track, while the grid items placed on it are the 'alignment subject' . I'm not sure how to deal with items placed on the same Gird Cell or occupying more than one row/column track when using content-distribution values. It's also not clear to me which are the cases where content-distribution values should fall-back to the corresponding content-position value. I'm taking as available space the difference between the grid container dimensions and the grid tracks breadth. When using the explicit grid definition, it may contain empty cells, but I think they won't be considered as available space. This implies that even using 'end' as content-position value, there will be space between the last item and the grid container; it may happen too with some content-distribution values. Shouldn't these particular cases be described in the Grid spec ? BR -- javi
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2014 21:47:34 UTC