- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:26:32 -0500
- To: Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 11/07/2014 08:10 AM, fantasai wrote: > On 11/05/2014 04:47 PM, Javier Fernandez wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on the implementation of the align-content and >> justify-content properties for grid and it seems ISSUE6 is still >> pending; I've already made some assumptions for the ongoing >> implementation but it'd be great to solve it as soon as possible. >> >> - http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-align-3/#issue-dda0e769 > > Issue 6 is just a terminology issue wrt "bounds of the grid". > Probably not the issue you're concerned about. > >> I'm assuming 2 different interpretations depending on the kind if value >> used for the alignment. >> >> - in case of <content-position> values, the 'alignment.container' is >> the grid container and the 'alignment subject' is the box defined by the >> grid tracks >> - in case of <content-distribution>,the 'alignment container' is the >> grid track, while the grid items placed on it are the 'alignment subject' . >> >> I'm not sure how to deal with items placed on the same Gird Cell or >> occupying more than one row/column track when using content-distribution >> values. > > Actually, I don't think what you wrote (point #2) makes sense... Oh, btw! Current spec text you might have missed: # The align-content property applies along the block (column) axis. # The justify-content property applies along the inline (row) axis. # In both properties, if a <content-distribution> is specified, the # fallback alignment is used instead. Notice specifically the last sentence. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 13:27:07 UTC