- From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 10:03:52 +1000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMdq699cgRaEkAsqy=cx5aZqMXMucwrTrbh=6nfKHf4ygQ_k3w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:13 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> > wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 2014-05-07 16:08 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > >> >> Instead, I would propose that the 'auto' value say: > >> >> # If the system is override, this value has the same effect that > >> >> # 'auto' would have for the overridden counter style. > >> >> which seems more consistent with how the override system otherwise > >> >> works. > >> > > >> > And I suppose the same proposal applies to 'range: auto', which has > >> > the same issue (though without the loop detection complexity), and > >> > which is defined in > >> > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#counter-style-range > >> > >> Both of these sound great to me. Changed. > > > > > > There is one problem with the new rule: the behavior of 'range: auto' is > not > > defined for complex builtin styles, especially Chinese and Ethiopic > styles > > which have no system defined at all. I think it might make sense to > specify > > the behavior for those styles separately, but this makes the spec more > > complex. > > > > For the reason, I propose that the behavior of 'auto' for 'range' should > be > > reverted to the previous version, so that we don't need to handle those > > special cases. As this behavior is slightly different from that of other > > descriptors, it might be helpful to have a note to describe. > > That's not a very strong reason. The "auto" range for the complex > predefined ones is just their normal range. I can just define that. Ping. It seems that you haven't fixed this problem in the spec. I'm fine with whatever the solution would be. I just wanted to prevent the spec from being more complex. - Xidorn
Received on Saturday, 31 May 2014 00:05:01 UTC