- From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 10:23:20 +1000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMdq69_S9HFciokfNSpf3VCx4dLex6WGcHFhS+wbRdboX+=q9w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:08 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#counter-style-speak-as > says, when describing the 'auto' value: > # If the system is override, this value has the same effect as the > # overridden style’s speak-as. > > This has an unusual interaction with the definition of the override > system, which says in > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#valuedef-override that: > # If a counter style uses the override system, any unspecified > # descriptors must be taken from the overridden counter style > # specified, rather than taking their initial values. > > It means that when the override system is used, speak-as: auto is > equivalent to having an omitted speak-as, and is *not* equivalent to > the overridden system having speak-as: auto. Both of these seem > wrong to me. > > Instead, I would propose that the 'auto' value say: > # If the system is override, this value has the same effect that > # 'auto' would have for the overridden counter style. > which seems more consistent with how the override system otherwise > works. > To my understanding, there is no difference between your proposal and the current spec, though your wording seems to be clearer. - Xidorn
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2014 00:24:29 UTC