- From: Salar Khalilzadeh <salar2k@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 23:46:08 +0430
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAFsVcz+ieB4GO10hAaTaKOeQE-s3hr7PsSP=r9t2W935hxO=ng@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > [please don't top post http://wiki.csswg.org/tools/www-style ] > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Salar Khalilzadeh <salar2k@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> On the other hand, that means you can't set "float: start;" on a bunch > >> of elements in some container and expect them to float to the same > >> side. > >> > >> We've addressed this in the Alignment module by having start/end base > >> themselves off the container's direction, and having separate > >> self-start/self-end values that base themselves on the item's > >> direction. > > > > Thanks for the info, I wasn't aware of that module. > > But now after reading that module I'm confused! Wasn't > > justify-self/align-content/... only for flex! > > Originally, yes, but it was extended to Grid Layout, and the Alignment > spec extends it to all the other block-level display types. > > > Doesn't this mean we will have two approach for a same issue? (or I > haven't > > read enough?) > > e.g.: float:right; justify-self:right; > > Nope, floating is a totally different thing. The align/justify > properties just align children to one side or the other; floating has > lots of additional rules about allowing the other contents to flow > around them, etc. > > ~TJ > Thanks for the info and for your work on the specs. The new specs are amazing. I'm still confused and guess I have to read more.
Received on Friday, 30 May 2014 19:16:36 UTC