- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 09:35:29 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> Should FontFaceSource be on the CSS global instead? CSS.fonts rather >> than document.fonts in a document environment and self.fonts in a >> worker environment. > > Maybe? It's not strictly a CSS thing, but I dunno what's most > appropriate here. I don't think there's really a "correct" place, so > it's more a matter of what patterns we generally want to develop in > the placement of things like this. It seems like the scope is at least wider than document. E.g. presumably you can use these fonts on a <canvas> element located in a document returned by XMLHttpRequest. And we might not want such documents to contain a FontFaceSet attribute. >> In the FontFace constructor you set status to "loading" at some point, >> but it's not clear from which task or microtask this is done. How can >> this be observed? > > I'm not sure what you mean by this. The algorithm from step 2 onward > is done asynchronously. Do I need further detail? If so, what? (And > also, is there written guidance on how to do it, if I'm doing it > wrong?) Well, you're changing the status but can that actually be observed somehow? If not, why are you changing the status? Changing the status of something and making that observable typically requires queuing a task, unless you use a promise, but in that case you can only change the status once, by resolving the promise. >> You say "reject with a NetworkError" but you don't define >> NetworkError. Maybe you mean a DOMException whose name is >> "NetworkError"? Same for exception/error names mentioned elsewhere. > > Yes, that is what I mean. Is there written guidance on how to > properly invoke errors in a spec document? Well, you could look at how http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-throw does it... In due course this should be integrated into IDL at which point it hopefully provides the proper wording for both normal members and promise returning members. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2014 07:35:56 UTC