On 21/05/2014 19:51, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> But also has been discussed as a generalized way to fit conceptual named >> combinators like it. > And in particular, is the/deep/ combinator. Simon, mind reverting > your removal? Oh, I didn’t remember /deep/. Done. I did not find anything in the Selectors spec corresponding to '/' IDENT '/', so I assumed it was accidentally left over from the removal of the reference combinator. The Selectors spec should include a section defining the general concept of named combinators, pointing out that (like pseudo-classes and pseudo-elements) they can be defined by other specs, possibly with a note about /deep/. -- Simon SapinReceived on Wednesday, 21 May 2014 20:44:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:40 UTC