- From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:31:39 +1000
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAMdq699zTV0tVoC7_YjNUYhN=3=kL4JW0Mu=SW0ZmYCPrjqzvg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:35 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > On May 16, 2014, at 5:00 AM, Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> What's the actual use case to allow the symbols to have an arbitrary > name when they are spoken? > > It depends on the reason the the author chose to use this list style. > For example, an author might be using icon fonts to convey some meaning in > the list marker. The alternative text should reflect that meaning. > > > >> I imagine that could be rather confusing for visually impaired people. > > > > What's the actual use case for to allow arbitrary symbols to be > displayed as ordered list markers? I imagine that could be rather confusing > for sighted people. ;-) > > > > I guess the question is rather why to *use* arbitrary symbols for > ordered lists. The only use case for that I can come up with is visual > design. The "box-corners" counter style you mentioned before seems to be a > good example for that. So what special meaning could be put into the list > markers, which needs to be reflected by screen readers? > > I'm mainly worried about the cases I can't predict, but here are a few. > Considering all the usecases you mentioned, I think it is very necessary to define the keyword value "symbol" to speak-as. With that, all this case here could be achieved without defining the additional complex "alt" descriptor. 1. Ordered: An fantasy author (think JRR Tolkien or GRR Martin) creates a > language with it's own number system. The numbers aren't pronounced "one", > "two", "three", but "elöhé", "fúto", and "thrüa". The author of the EPUB > wants the visually impaired reader to have and enjoy the same reading > experience as his sighted readers. The author understands not everyone > likes audiobooks. > This one is the easiest, with an additional style with "fixed" system: @counter-stype a { /* whatever */ speak-as: fantasy-speak; } @counter-style fantasy-speak { system: fixed; symbols: "elöhé" "fúto" "thrüa"; speak-as: symbol; } If the language supports more complex expression, say, it use quaternary numeral system, with zero pronounced "zig". It can be easily reached by modifying the fantasy-speak to @counter-style fatasy-speak { system: numeral; symbols: "zig" "elöhé" "fúto" "thrüa"; speak-as: symbol; } That says, if the rule of your pronouncing numeral system can be expressed via @counter-style, you can use "speak-as" to generate that pronunciation. Note: Coincidentally, as I alluded to in my original email the the list, > the box corner symbols are actually number characters for the alien > language from the video game Fez <http://www.ign.com/wikis/fez/Fez_Numbers>. > You don't know this immediately in the game, but you find out through > pattern recognition over the course of play, and so speaking them literally > as English "one, two, three" would equate to a spoiler. > > > 2. Ordered or Unordered: A web debugging tool uses the symbols generated > content symbols ⋗ and ⋖ to indicate console list input and output. > > ⋗ var foo = ['bar', 'baz']; > ⋖ undefined > ⋗ foo[1]; > ⋖ "baz" > > The authors of this web debugging tool receive a complaint that the > console output is being spoken by screen readers as: > > LESS-THAN WITH DOT var foo = ['bar', 'baz']; > GREATER-THAN WITH DOT undefined > LESS-THAN WITH DOT foo[1]; > GREATER-THAN WITH DOT "bar" > > It'd be much more logical to be able to define these list marker symbols > as meaningful "alt" strings: > > Input: var foo = ['bar', 'baz']; > Output: undefined > Input: foo[1]; > Output: "bar" > Likely, @counter-style a { system: cyclic; symbols: '⋗' '⋖'; speak-as: io-speak; } @counter-style io-speak { system: cyclic; symbols: 'Input' 'Output'; speak-as: symbol; } > Note: Example #2 was a real bug report from Victor Tsaran. Some of the > details have been changed since the Web Inspector is using background > images for these at the moment. https://webkit.org/b/133045. > If you want to use "alt" to have the same power, you have to define a set of new syntax which, in fact, has already been included in the @counter-style itself. So I propose that we add a new keyword value "symbol" to speak-as, and remove "alphabetic" as it is not clearly defined what is "letter". - Xidorn
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2014 23:32:47 UTC