Hey Fantasai,
On 09 May 2014, at 21:07 , fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 03:03 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> (On advise of Richard) I read the latest CSS ruby document[1] in conjunction with Robin's HTML Ruby draft[2], and I got stuck on two minor things:
>>
>> (1) section 2.1, last item on 'ruby-text-container': shouldn't that item refer to HTML/XHTML <rtc> element, rather than <ruby>? This would also make it consistent with the UA style sheet in Appendix A ('Supporting Ruby Layout')
>
> Yes. Fixed.
>
>> (2) section 2.1, the penultimate item refers to the XHTML <rbc> element (note that it does not refer to HTML...), and the same element also appears in the UA style sheet in Appendix A (referring to XHTML _and_ HTML). However, that element is not defined in[2]...
>
> Indeed. The style sheet, at this point, is intended to cover all
> the (X)HTMLs so far. :) Since a UA cannot distinguish between
> XHTML1.1+Ruby and XHTML5, if it wants to support both these rules
> will all go into the same default UA style sheet.
Ah. O.k., that explains it... (maybe putting this extra info into the document may help readers)
Thanks!
ivan
>
> ~fantasai
----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2014 04:27:47 UTC