W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2014

Re: [css3-ruby] Small inconsistencies between the CSS document and the ruby HTML draft...

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 06:27:15 +0200
Cc: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-cjk@w3.org, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Message-Id: <72BEDAFA-D9D3-4339-BC12-7674F653503C@w3.org>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Hey Fantasai,

On 09 May 2014, at 21:07 , fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:

> On 09/25/2013 03:03 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> (On advise of Richard) I read the latest CSS ruby document[1] in conjunction with Robin's HTML Ruby draft[2], and I got stuck on two minor things:
>> (1) section 2.1, last item on 'ruby-text-container': shouldn't that item refer to HTML/XHTML <rtc> element, rather than <ruby>? This would also make it consistent with the UA style sheet in Appendix A ('Supporting Ruby Layout')
> Yes. Fixed.
>> (2) section 2.1, the penultimate item refers to the XHTML <rbc> element (note that it does not refer to HTML...), and the same element also appears in the UA style sheet in Appendix A (referring to XHTML _and_ HTML). However, that element is not defined in[2]...
> Indeed. The style sheet, at this point, is intended to cover all
> the (X)HTMLs so far. :) Since a UA cannot distinguish between
> XHTML1.1+Ruby and XHTML5, if it wants to support both these rules
> will all go into the same default UA style sheet.

Ah. O.k., that explains it... (maybe putting this extra info into the document may help readers)



> ~fantasai

Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me

Received on Saturday, 10 May 2014 04:27:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:42 UTC