- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:07:23 -0700
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org
- CC: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
On 09/25/2013 03:03 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> (On advise of Richard) I read the latest CSS ruby document[1] in conjunction with Robin's HTML Ruby draft[2], and I got stuck on two minor things:
>
> (1) section 2.1, last item on 'ruby-text-container': shouldn't that item refer to HTML/XHTML <rtc> element, rather than <ruby>? This would also make it consistent with the UA style sheet in Appendix A ('Supporting Ruby Layout')
Yes. Fixed.
> (2) section 2.1, the penultimate item refers to the XHTML <rbc> element (note that it does not refer to HTML...), and the same element also appears in the UA style sheet in Appendix A (referring to XHTML _and_ HTML). However, that element is not defined in[2]...
Indeed. The style sheet, at this point, is intended to cover all
the (X)HTMLs so far. :) Since a UA cannot distinguish between
XHTML1.1+Ruby and XHTML5, if it wants to support both these rules
will all go into the same default UA style sheet.
~fantasai
Received on Friday, 9 May 2014 19:07:51 UTC