- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 18:52:57 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Tab and I, at dholbert's request, put both variants of the flexbox algorithm
(the CR version, focusing on flex factors vs. the LC version, focusing on
desired free space) into the new editor's draft of the spec.
We fixed all the bugs that were reported in both versions and aligned their
wording as best we could. For details on that, the Disposition of Comments
is here:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/issues-lc-20140325
We are looking for review:
1. If you notice any discrepancies, these are likely errors! Tell us.
2. If you notice any bugs not fixed, previously reported or otherwise,
tell us!
3. If you have a preference for one algorithm or one wording over the
other, tell us!
Our goal is for the algorithm to be correct, precise, and readable.
(Yes, all three at once.) Please complain accordingly.
~fantasai and TJ
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2014 01:53:34 UTC