Re: [CSSWG] CSS Level 2 now has a public Editor’s Draft

Simon, all,

is there a chance we refer to CSS 1, CSS 2, and CSS 2.1 as CSS 1, CSS
2, and CSS 2.1, and everything else (CSS 3, “CSS 4,” &c.) as “CSS”?
In other words, could we please just wrap up CSS 2.1 (as CSS 2.1, and
not CSS 2, and not CSS) and then leave everything prior to “CSS 3”
alone?

Because it seems we somewhat switched from a versioning model to a
living standard model, and going back and retrofitting old specs
appears to increase confusion, not clarity.

That, I think, will enable us to refer to CSS just as CSS faster than
if we were to tamper with old concepts (and the ideas of CSS 1, CSS 2,
and CSS 2.1 are old and firmly anchored concepts).

-- 
Jens O. Meiert
http://meiert.com/en/

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 09:40:22 UTC