- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:42:38 -0800
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > On 04/03/2014 09:05, Johannes Koch wrote: >> Am 04.03.2014 02:02, schrieb Simon Sapin: >>> Please use the Editor’s Draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/ >>> >>> It’s not very different right now because the CR is still recent, but >>> the ED is the one that’s always the most up-to-date, including fixes >>> for known bugs like the one Tab just made for this bug. >> >> Is there a diff between the CR and the current ED? Or between different >> versions of the ED? That would make it easier to keep an implementation >> up-to-date with the current ED. > > > There as Mercurial repository: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/ > > You can use that URL with "hg clone" and other Mercurial tools, or in a > browser to use the hgweb interface. > > Here is the history of the source file for CSS Syntax. (For the generated > file, change .bs to .html) > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/log/tip/css-syntax/Overview.bs > > The CR was published on 2014-02-20. The latest revision for Syntax at that > time was 8663b0d5bbf0 "Fix tokenization of numbers starting with a digit." > so everything after that are changes that are not on /TR yet. > > At this time, the fix for the url() tokenization bug you reported is the > only normative change since CR. Still, you probably want to take the general > habit of looking at the latest revision (ED) rather than snapshots that can > be several months behind. The url() bug is now documented in the Change section, too - in general, normative changes from the CR will be documented in that section. (Simon, be sure to update that if you make any tweaks, too.) ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2014 18:43:25 UTC