W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2014

Re: [css-animations] What happens if a @keyframes rule is added after the fact?

From: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 09:20:24 +0900
Message-ID: <53BC8AC8.6040108@mozilla.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
On 2014/07/08 7:43, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> (b) seems simplest to me. What do you think Tab?
> Yeah, on further thought, (b) is probably fine.  There's a
> sufficiently justifiable asymmetry there between the "nothing, then
> something" and "something, then something else" that I'm okay with it.

Ok, I've just now updated Firefox to do (b).

It would be nice to get the spec to reflect this but I understand there 
is a shortage of editorial resources for CSS Animations work. I'm happy 
to send PRs if there's a github mirror of the spec repository.


Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 00:20:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:44 UTC