On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 2014/07/08 7:43, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote: >>> (b) seems simplest to me. What do you think Tab? >> >> Yeah, on further thought, (b) is probably fine. There's a >> sufficiently justifiable asymmetry there between the "nothing, then >> something" and "something, then something else" that I'm okay with it. > > Ok, I've just now updated Firefox to do (b). > > It would be nice to get the spec to reflect this but I understand there is a shortage of editorial resources for CSS Animations work. I'm happy to send PRs if there's a github mirror of the spec repository. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts But it's up to the individual spec authors if they pay attention to PRs... Given that our github spec repo is read-only at the moment (I'm planning on making it read-write soon), I'm happy to assist anyone landing a PR (it's a straightforward process but requires some tooling setup). Peter
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 01:23:14 UTC