W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2014

Re: [css-animations] What happens if a @keyframes rule is added after the fact?

From: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 18:22:46 -0700
Cc: www-style@w3.org, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Message-Id: <9829548A-54A7-4BAC-8F35-C8F8B988C8FB@hp.com>
To: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>

On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote:

> On 2014/07/08 7:43, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>> (b) seems simplest to me. What do you think Tab?
>> Yeah, on further thought, (b) is probably fine.  There's a
>> sufficiently justifiable asymmetry there between the "nothing, then
>> something" and "something, then something else" that I'm okay with it.
> Ok, I've just now updated Firefox to do (b).
> It would be nice to get the spec to reflect this but I understand there is a shortage of editorial resources for CSS Animations work. I'm happy to send PRs if there's a github mirror of the spec repository.


But it's up to the individual spec authors if they pay attention to PRs...

Given that our github spec repo is read-only at the moment (I'm planning on making it read-write soon), I'm happy to assist anyone landing a PR (it's a straightforward process but requires some tooling setup).


Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 01:23:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:44 UTC