- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 01:49:02 +0000
- To: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
- CC: "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 2014/07/08 7:43, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote: >>> (b) seems simplest to me. What do you think Tab? >> >> Yeah, on further thought, (b) is probably fine. There's a >> sufficiently justifiable asymmetry there between the "nothing, then >> something" and "something, then something else" that I'm okay with it. > > Ok, I've just now updated Firefox to do (b). > > It would be nice to get the spec to reflect this but I understand there is a shortage of editorial resources for CSS Animations work. I'm happy to send PRs if there's a github mirror of the spec repository. > We will discuss this on the call tomorrow but I took a first stab at covering this in this ED revision: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/2953a647c222
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 01:49:35 UTC