- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:35:25 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 07/02/2014 01:29 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 07/02/2014 12:09 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 7/2/14, 3:05 PM, fantasai wrote: >>> I currently have no opinion on whether an anonymous ruby container >>> should encapsulate multiple segments separated by whitespace or not. >>> If you have an opinion, I will happy adopt it into the spec. >> >> I don't know what the expected use cases are, so I have no opinion on spec functional grounds. >> >> For tables, people definitely wanted consecutive cells wrapped >> in a single table. For ruby, I have no idea whether this >> situation would even arise in a non-trying-to-break-the-spec way. > > I did at one point propose that just using <rb> and <rt> without > <ruby> could be a fairly typist-friendly way of marking up ruby, > but that didn't get much traction. :) > >> That said, making it work like tables sure simplifies implementation, >> since the existing table stuff can be reused. ;) > > Then I'm happy to make it work like tables and simplify your > implementation. :D > > But I think that will have to wait until tomorrow. Assume it is > so for now, and that I will consider any spec prose otherwise as > a bug to fix when I am more awake... Try this? http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ruby/#box-fixup ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 22:36:02 UTC