- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:29:29 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 07/02/2014 12:09 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 7/2/14, 3:05 PM, fantasai wrote: >> I currently have no opinion on whether an anonymous ruby container >> should encapsulate multiple segments separated by whitespace or not. >> If you have an opinion, I will happy adopt it into the spec. > > I don't know what the expected use cases are, so I have no opinion on spec functional grounds. > > For tables, people definitely wanted consecutive cells wrapped > in a single table. For ruby, I have no idea whether this > situation would even arise in a non-trying-to-break-the-spec way. I did at one point propose that just using <rb> and <rt> without <ruby> could be a fairly typist-friendly way of marking up ruby, but that didn't get much traction. :) > That said, making it work like tables sure simplifies implementation, > since the existing table stuff can be reused. ;) Then I'm happy to make it work like tables and simplify your implementation. :D But I think that will have to wait until tomorrow. Assume it is so for now, and that I will consider any spec prose otherwise as a bug to fix when I am more awake... ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 20:30:03 UTC