- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:13:02 -0500
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>, W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, Gabriele Romanato <gabriele.romanato@gmail.com>, Public CSS Test Suite <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le 2014-01-23 04:39, Gérard Talbot a écrit : >> CSS 2.2 >> ------- >> >> - Bert reminded the group that tests still need to be written for >> some errata changes coming out of 2.1 before 2.2 can be >> published. > > >> CSS 2.2 >> ------- >> >> bert: Some time ago we discussed publishing an update for CSS 2.2 >> and we discovered we need new tests due to changes from >> errata. CSS 2 Revision 2 The second revision of CSS level 2 integrates a handful of errata since the publication of CSS level 2 revision 1. Test suite authors for errata http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.2 >> bert: This is a request for people to again look at the wiki page. > CSS 2.1 Test suite: CSS 2.1 Errata http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1#css-21-errata > ------------- > > Again in section 17.4 and/or 17.5.2: > > http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/anonymous-table-box-width-001/ > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/anonymous-table-box-width-001.htm > (waiting for review) > > Right now, there are 1 bug report on this at Microsoft IE Feedback and > 2 bug reports at bugzilla.mozilla.org. Here they are: Bug 811918: Internet Explorer 11 table caption https://connect.microsoft.com/IE/feedback/details/811918/internet-explorer-11-table-caption in which it is said: " (...) IE 11 doesn't take the caption in account for calculating the table's width " Bug 674520: computed table width ignores table caption minimum width https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674520 Bug 349144: Anonymous box container of table with caption should not stretch to fit the caption https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349144 ---------- There is more to add. Gabriele Romanato has had many tests on sections 4, 5, 6 which were *_not submitted_* (therefore not reviewed either) which I believe should be submitted and should have been submitted too: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/gabriele/incoming/basic/ In my opinion, a majority of those tests are unique and they would (or could) increase coverage of CSS2.1 test suite and/or CSS2.2 test suite. Gérard
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 21:13:45 UTC