Re: [CSS21] Tests to be written for errata changes

Le 2014-01-23 04:39, Gérard Talbot a écrit :
>> CSS 2.2
>> -------
>> 
>>   - Bert reminded the group that tests still need to be written for
>>          some errata changes coming out of 2.1 before 2.2 can be
>>          published.
> 
> 
>>  CSS 2.2
>>  -------
>> 
>>   bert: Some time ago we discussed publishing an update for CSS 2.2
>>         and we discovered we need new tests due to changes from
>>         errata.

CSS 2 Revision 2
The second revision of CSS level 2 integrates a handful of errata since 
the publication of CSS level 2 revision 1.
Test suite authors for errata
http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.2


>>   bert: This is a request for people to again look at the wiki page.
> 


CSS 2.1 Test suite: CSS 2.1 Errata
http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1#css-21-errata


> -------------
> 
> Again in section 17.4 and/or 17.5.2:
> 
> http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/anonymous-table-box-width-001/
> 
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/anonymous-table-box-width-001.htm
> (waiting for review)
> 
> Right now, there are 1 bug report on this at Microsoft IE Feedback and
> 2 bug reports at bugzilla.mozilla.org.

Here they are:

Bug 811918: Internet Explorer 11 table caption
https://connect.microsoft.com/IE/feedback/details/811918/internet-explorer-11-table-caption
in which it is said:
"
(...) IE 11 doesn't take the caption in account for calculating the 
table's width
"

Bug 674520: computed table width ignores table caption minimum width
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674520

Bug 349144: Anonymous box container of table with caption should not 
stretch to fit the caption
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349144

----------

There is more to add. Gabriele Romanato has had many tests on sections 
4, 5, 6 which were *_not submitted_* (therefore not reviewed either) 
which I believe should be submitted and should have been submitted too:

http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/gabriele/incoming/basic/

In my opinion, a majority of those tests are unique and they would (or 
could) increase coverage of CSS2.1 test suite and/or CSS2.2 test suite.

Gérard

Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 21:13:45 UTC