W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2014

[CSS21] Tests to be written for errata changes

From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:39:02 -0500
To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6d3ba199c247284f5c4052040c0fefda@gtalbot.org>
> CSS 2.2
> -------
> 
>   - Bert reminded the group that tests still need to be written for
>          some errata changes coming out of 2.1 before 2.2 can be
>          published.


>  CSS 2.2
>  -------
> 
>   bert: Some time ago we discussed publishing an update for CSS 2.2
>         and we discovered we need new tests due to changes from
>         errata.

>   <plinss> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.2
>   bert: This is a request for people to again look at the wiki page.



Bert,

Have you examined this section:
http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1#css-21-errata
I ask because I submitted many new tests (sometimes, 24 months ago) 
which were created in order to take into account, to take into 
consideration changes or correction in the CSS2.1 spec.

[Rebecca, I think the column "Existing Tests" in
http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1#css-21-errata
should have been named "Modified tests or new tests".]

------------

Section 6.1.1

http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html#s.6.1.1
have these [new and waiting for review] tests:
test.csswg.org/shepherd/search/name/inherit-static-offset

------------

Section 15.3a

Test that covers "inherit" as font family name:

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/font-family-rule-004a.htm


----------

Section 17.5

http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html#s.17.5

[css21] Section 17.5.2.1 should be clarified
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0743.html

Following up on that thread, I submitted 52 tests on 'table-layout: 
fixed'

http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/search/testcase/spec/css21/author/gtalbot/name/fixed-table-layout-003/

and these need to be reviewed. There are at least 3 tests (among those 
52) which represent an unexpected issue with the current spec:

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-003e08.htm

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-003e10.htm

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-003e12.htm

More info:
[CSS21] Overconstrained fixed table layout
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0093.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0189.html

Added to these 52 are
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-025.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-026.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-027.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-028.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-029.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-030.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/fixed-table-layout-031.htm

which present also that same unexpected issue for the current CSS2.1 
spec.

-------------

Again in section 17.4 and/or 17.5.2:

http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/anonymous-table-box-width-001/

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/anonymous-table-box-width-001.htm
(waiting for review)

Right now, there are 1 bug report on this at Microsoft IE Feedback and 2 
bug reports at bugzilla.mozilla.org.

etc..

Gérard ... who must run right now..
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 09:39:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:38 UTC