- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:50:39 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > It has come to my attention that the Font Load Events spec has never > reached FPWD. I intended to do this immediately after our Fall f2f > last year, as soon as I made John's requested edits, but it slipped my > mind and then I forgot all about it. > > So, can we go ahead and resolve on a FPWD like, right now? We want to > implement ASAP, but want to match it up with a CR, or at least LC, > like usual. > > I'd really like it if we can do a quick CfC before the next f2f, so I > can set up a publication for, like, Tuesday. I don't think this'll be > controversial, since everyone seemed pretty okay with the spec last > time it was presented, and John is pretty happy with the current state > of the spec too. (We've been conversing privately and making a few > other tweaks as necessary.) > > I'd then like to give a few weeks to a month for review, filling in > whatever final holes are discovered in the spec, and then request an > LC in March. John is pinging relevant people at Moz to get reviews > done ASAP as well, which I greatly appreciate. > > What do y'all say? FPWD CfC OMGWTFBBQ? > Wait, what? You’re asking for a FPWD *before* implementing? That’s crazy talk. +1 to FPWD.
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:51:09 UTC