W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2014

Re: [specs] Discrepancies in spec explanations

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 00:01:09 -0800
Message-ID: <5497CFC5.4000104@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 12/21/2014 09:21 PM, Estelle Weyl wrote:
> i am seeing differing conventions in different specs
>
> for example, in animation, for animation name I see
> Value:<single-animation-name>#
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-animations/#animation-name
>
> but for transition-property i see
> Value:none | <single-transition-property> [ ‘,’ <single-transition-property> ]*
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transitions/#transition-property-property
>
> should the former be
> Value:<single-animation-name> [ ‘,’ <single-animation-name> ]*
>
> or should the latter be
> Value: all | none | <single-transition-property>#

The second. The #-multiplier is new, because those earlier ones were so
annoying to read and write. :)

~fantasai
Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 08:01:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:49 UTC