- From: Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:34:03 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On 18/12/14 20:33, fantasai wrote:
>>
>> b) min-width *does* affect tracks sizing.
>>
>> So despite being under min-content restriction we distribute space till
>> we fulfill the min-width of the grid container. This means that the
>> track will grow till 100px (used breadth: 100px, max breadth: 110px).
>>
>> Which is the right one?
>>
>> Now should b) be correct one, things become a bit complex because I
>> guess we should also check that the values of {min/max}-{width/height}
>> are definite.
>
> b) is the right one. Here's why. According to the definition I gave
> for min/max-width/height, first we do layout ignoring them. The
> track and the grid container are 30px wide. This violates the min
> constraint on the grid container, so we redo layout with the width
> value as 100px instead of 'min-content'. The track and the grid
> container end up as 100px wide.
>
> Does that make sense?
It makes total sense thanks. I'll update the implementation based on
this answer.
BR
Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 08:34:47 UTC