- From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 23:51:14 +0000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 01:37:49PM -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:34:07AM -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote: > >> > Finally, I think it would make sense to elaborate a bit further on the > >> > behavior of :current, :past, and :future with respect to ancestor > >> > elements: :current applies to all ancestors of a :current element (all > >> > the way to :root), but :future and :past do not, precisely because > >> > :current does. Any given element must match at most one of :current, > >> > :past, or :future. > >> > >> Yeah, that's definitely the intent. Added. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Where does the current in-progress spec live, with the text you added? > > Is there a version control repository somewhere, or a snapshot newer > > than the 26 November 2014 version? (I didn't see any references to > > either on http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/ .) > > That latter one is the live spec, I've just got some repository > conflicts right now, so I haven't pushed the commit yet. Don't worry. > ^_^ No problem. Is the repository clonable from somewhere? - Josh Triplett
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2014 12:47:13 UTC