W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2014

Re: [css3-box] run-ins: an alternative model

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:08:37 -0700
Message-ID: <53ED4F85.6040306@inkedblade.net>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, www-style@w3.org
On 08/07/2012 07:19 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 8/7/12 9:44 PM, fantasai wrote:
>> I think it's less weird for the out-of-flows to stay between the element's
>> they're between. It also seems easier from an implementation perspective,
>> since you can preserve the painting order through the box-tree order as
>> usual, no?
> I hadn't thought about the painting order, to be honest.  I don't know what the "right" thing here is in terms of painting...
>>      * If a run-in is preceded by an inline-level box that is not
>>        a run-in (ignoring any anonymous inline boxes containing only
>>        collapsed white space), then it forces the creation of an
>>        anonymous block boundary between it and the preceding inline,
>>        as if it were immediately preceded by an empty anonymous block.
> Better, but see comments about "anonymous block boundary" really needing defining.

Just to follow-up, we added this into the Display module, here:

Received on Friday, 15 August 2014 00:09:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:45 UTC