- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:08:37 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, www-style@w3.org
On 08/07/2012 07:19 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 8/7/12 9:44 PM, fantasai wrote: >> I think it's less weird for the out-of-flows to stay between the element's >> they're between. It also seems easier from an implementation perspective, >> since you can preserve the painting order through the box-tree order as >> usual, no? > > I hadn't thought about the painting order, to be honest. I don't know what the "right" thing here is in terms of painting... > >> * If a run-in is preceded by an inline-level box that is not >> a run-in (ignoring any anonymous inline boxes containing only >> collapsed white space), then it forces the creation of an >> anonymous block boundary between it and the preceding inline, >> as if it were immediately preceded by an empty anonymous block. > > Better, but see comments about "anonymous block boundary" really needing defining. Just to follow-up, we added this into the Display module, here: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-display-3/#run-in ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 15 August 2014 00:09:05 UTC