On 04/12/2014 01:45 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > Hi fantasai, > > LC Issue 2 [1] is still open and I would very much like to resolve > it now. We discussed renaming all current long hand properties for > mask-* a while back and it seems there is no one in favor for > renaming mask-image, mask-type, mask-size and others. The structure > of the spec got much cleaner and I do not believe that people would > still get confused by reading the spec. Can we close this issue? I think it's probably okay to leave mask-* as it is, since for simple cases thats what will be used. I'm still not totally happy with mask-box-*, since it's really box-mask, but that's probably just me having English grammtatical biases. I can't come up with anything better. :/ ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 07:08:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:39 UTC