- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:01:38 +0100
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On 29/03/2014 17:36, Simon Sapin wrote: > On 29/03/2014 04:29, Xidorn Quan wrote: >> If there is more than one position keywords, namely 'inside' and >> 'outside', appear in list-style, should we accept one of them as the >> identifier for list-style-type or simply reject the whole property as a >> syntax error? > > It should be rejected. > > The spec does not do so yet (that’s a bug to fix), but > <counter-style-name> should be defined as a <custom-ident>, so that this > restriction applies: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-values/#custom-idents >> an identifier that could be interpreted as a pre-defined keyword in >> any position or multiplication of the <custom-ident> component value >> is excluded, and is invalid as a <custom-ident> matching to that >> component value Looks like I spoke too fast, sorry. The WG is still undecided about what to do with <custom-ident> in shorthands: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20140402#l-499 -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 17:02:04 UTC