- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:12:14 -0700
- To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- CC: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Sep 30, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > Do we need to differentiate between live/read-only and immutable at all? > > In theory it could be useful for some clients to know when an object is immutable, because it means they can avoid copying it. > > Currently we don't need DOMRectImmutable because AFAIK we don't have anything that would return an immutable rect. So we can avoid specifying it for now, and just specify DOMRect and DOMRectMutable. We would have with SVG DOM. When we replace SVGRect with DOMRect, we should fix the behavior as well and let animVal return an immutable DOMRect. Greetings, Dirk > > Rob > -- > Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 18:13:01 UTC