W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:17:55 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaK0_b_J6_CwVXqz06-fYx40vvJpoc6phyDpQN_ZaOdLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2013JulSep/thread.html#msg663
>
> Takeaway so far:
>
> * There is precedent for separate interfaces: URLUtils and
> URLUtilsReadOnly.
> * Anne van Kesteren at least seems to prefer separate interfaces.
>

We can have separate interfaces but I don't think one should inherit from
the other. That gets confusing because you have a "read only" or
"immutable" interface which is also implemented by objects which are
mutable.

Next decision: DOMRectImmutable or DOMRectReadOnly?

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 11:18:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:50:57 UTC