- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:27:02 -0400
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
I thought I did, but you're right, there were a few left overs in computed values and in the definition of ''normal''. Done, thank you for pointing these out. /koji On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:26 PM, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote: > > At the F2F the other week there was a resolution to drop the > minimum/optimum/maximum for word-spacing: > > http://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/?date=2013-09-13 > >> fantasai: Actually, 2 things I want to drop from the spec currently: >> fantasai: (1) 'text-align: start end' >> fantasai: (2) word-spacing can take up to 3 values defining minimum >> optimum maximum; don't have any implementations and would prefer to >> drop and figure out justification limits in level 4 >> Bert: do we want to have limits or do we want to allow other algorithms as well? >> Bert: I'm ok with dropping it, not sure we should add it back in afterwards. >> fantasai: I think we should drop it until we have a clear idea what we want for that. >> Koji: seems like consensus to drop >> RESOLVED: drop minimum/optimum/maximum values for word-spacing > > I think these edits need be done before LC. > > Regards, > > John Daggett >
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 18:27:32 UTC